Im driving home from the game Saturday night, listening to the guys do the post game show, trying to gloss over yet another loss. The word "close" kept getting thrown around as a bastion of success. "This team is
close", "look at all these
close games", "How much
closer can this team get before they start turning these
close losses into wins?"
Close is defined in Webster's as being almost even, as in tally or score. Im left wondering how long does being
close go on being good enough. You can go on being close until the cows come home, and your nothing more than
close. The Moon is close in the grand scheme of the universe, but its been close for eons. Close is fine, when it eventually leads to something. And usually you can just tell that that something is eventually going to happen. The 2007 season was a prime example. Sitting there watching the games, you just knew something good was happening. I keep hearing how "next year" will be better. Well, I can honestly say that I dont have that same feeling as I had in 2007. Others may, and they are welcome to those feelings, Im just not seeing it.
Sitting with 1000, well 900 (too many Toledo fans on our side with their cow bells and chants) of your closest friends, we were treated to a decent game. The weather, though alot more wetter than the Pitt game, but felt less colder and less windy (which could have been due to sitting in the West Stands, I admit). However, I figured before the game that the weather down on the field would have a greater impact on Toledo than it did UB, and I was right. The weather conditions slowed Toledo's offense to the point where the game would be close. A stiff wind and a soaked and slick water logged ball will slow any passing attack. It also lends itself to turnovers, especially when passes arent on target (turned into a touchdown by UB) and fumbles (which Toledo returned for a touchdown). You cant have better weather conditions than UB had to pull off an upset (I cant believe I said that about another MAC team, pathetic) Slow down their vaunted offense, use your run game against there not so good defense (lets face it, UB bread and butter isnt passing) and let the defense keep the game close. The game was there for the taking all game long. But again,
close doesnt get it done.
OFFENSE
You want Licata to get a shot? Im willing to listen to why that is. Really, I want to hear why in the comments. IF he can develop into something, Im fine with it. The problem is that word "develop." Im not worried about his talent or being capable of that, Im pretty sure he could, I dont feel confident that him or any QB is going to develop. Do we honestly believe that a gameplan can be put in place to suit whoever is out there? Do we honestly believe that any QB can develop here?
With that being said if Zordich (yet another undeveloped QB) isnt the answere, can we please find a place to put him. You cant take that kind of heart off the field. You just cant. Let him play fullback for cripes sake. But as we all know, what is a fullback?
as for the rest, Ill get to it.
DEFENSE
Played great, took advantage of the weather, except......Ill get to it.....
I gotta say this. My glasses were kind of rain speckled, so Im not sure if it was Mack or Means (they both got credit for the tackle) who ran down Fluellen on his long run in the third quarter. Chasing Fluellen down after 40 yards from behind the play, if that was Mack, every NFL scout will be looking at that play, I guarantee it. Great hustle.
SPECIAL TEAMS
You cant ask for a better performance out of the special teams considering the conditions. Yes Clarke missed a field goal (did he really, or did the ref get a rain drop in the eye, because Clarke seemed convinced he made it), the punting game was an actual bright spot. The rugby punts are perfect for windy conditions, just like in golf, keep it low for better results. And it keeps the ball out of the hands of Toledos returner. The blocked extra points were great efforts. Return game didnt cost UB.
So the "Ill get to it" parts. If this was a one game thing it would be different, but it happens time and time again. This is the difference in being "close" and being a winner. Five drives made all the difference....
6 plays, 73 yards out of the half for a Toledo TD, Fluellen starts to roll, UB 14- Toledo-13
4 plays, 86 yards, Fluellen up the middle time and time again for a TD, UB 14 - Toledo - 19 Toledo is starting to feel it
8 plays, 84 yards, another Toledo TD, Toledo - 25 UB- still 14
Defensively, UB had no answers after seeing the same thing over and over again on three drives. Three drives, no answers or adjustments. Sure they made adjustments eventually, that worked, but the game was in the balance then, "eventually" is the difference between close and winning
Offensively, Fourth quarter, Toledo is up 5, 3 plays (all passing, all incomplete) 0 yards. It seemed like there was a sense of urgency there to start chucking the ball when conditions and the way the game was playing out, didnt call for that.
Next drive, still only down by 5, 3 running plays nets 30 yards with BO, moving the chains, and then pass, pass, pass. netting -2 yards.


?
You can be close all day long, but these examples never get you over the top.....and they are nothing new...Close just isnt enough anymore.....
Onto Miami, please NO RAIN!!!!!!
GO BULLS!!!!!
&
WHO ARE WE?......